Online Business Wiki
How can you say the mainstream media is not biased?
America Online and Time Warner merged in 2001 to create one of the largest media companies in the world. The new colossus has dozens of subsidiaries, including online services, print and organizations broadcast news, cable companies, movie studios, music publishers and publishing houses, and 78% of the Time / Warner 's contributions policies go directly to the Democratic Party. Http: / / www.opensecrets.org/orgs/summary.php?id=D000000094 monopoly can now talk, look at all these cases Time Warner owns, and tell me Hollywood and the news media are not politically biased for the Democrats? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_assets_owned_by_Time_Warner Edit: Green Pagen, 78% are not employee contributions, it is corporate contributions, and money lobbying for McCain is not 100 times greater, it is much smaller, read the link. McCain $ 20,000 and $ 298,000 Obama got http://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/toprecips.php?id=D000000094
On July 29th Annual Convention Chicago Tribune Perspective section, there is a section in which the paper finally admits having idolized shamelessly about Obama! There no doubt that the media covering Obama as if he were a rock superstar. In fact, it is not even a simple analogy: the July magazine Der Spiegel Obama on the cover with the title single, "Superstar". Is nauseating or what? Can you ever … in a million years, imagine a newspaper magazine or a call from a Republican candidate (even one as incredible as Ronald Reagan), a superstar? Here is the simple truth: some years ago, a study was conducted. Journalists across the country were questioned about their political affiliation was. The results are offensive: 1) Conservative: 13% 2) Independent: 24% 3) Liberal: 63% addition to the low number of impressive conservative journalists, two things should draw your attention. Firstly, the percentage of "Independent" far exceeds the percentage of the population in general. Therefore, they dug a little further and discovered that the vast majority of these "independents" were really liberals in disguise. They simply want to identify. The second Shocker statistics is the number of liberals there are in journalism. Well, for many of us, it is not a surprise all.Look other career, as the entertainment industry. The vast majority of Hollywood liberals. But consider this: just put half of these fake "independent" with the Liberal numbers and you have 75% liberal journalists. The real figure is much closer 87%, since all these "independents" were fictitious. This figure is jives with the way the Liberals have voted in presidential elections. If only the votes of journalists have been counted, we could have actually one of the presidents elected in the last 40 years! Last thing to prove the liberal bias evident in the grotesque and journalism (and I think that even our liberal friends will admit to it): just view pictures of Bush and Obama. When Bush photo journalists, they should crouch as the vulture for half the day, until the second a split unhappy when her eyes are half closed, his mouth is twisted in some way. It's a picture of Bush have always publish.In contrast, Photos of Barack Obama are always look as if he was on the cover of GQ magazine, or something. Liberal bias? He can not deny. ** Edit ** When I thumbs down to an insightful, thoughtful, response information like this, it just proves my image of the Liberals. They are so desperate to stay in their imaginary dream world, that when they read something they do not like (they do not like reality), they hit. I can almost see a them now, practically foaming at the mouth, pumping his finger on the keyboard as fast as he can … thumbs down! Thumbs down! I am a Liberal and I hate reality. thumbs down!
online business support how reliable? (online business support)
